Testing description by senuri

Archive mailing' in a form response is according to SO Help ment to be used "To keep track of all mailings related to your selections and projects" but, actually creates a link to 'Ricipient sources', which can't be edited or deleted. What is the idea here? Why such link in a form response which is only ment to be recipients triggered by a form..? If at later stage changing 'Archive mailing' to another project, the 'Ricipient sources' will still be connected to the old project (!!) and can't be edited or deleted. This leads to that new project members added to the old project will recieve form responses which are no longer is relevant. Understand that this is a known issue but it has by some unknown reason not been filed as a bug. What is the purpose of having 'Recipient sources' linked to a project in a form response?  

Is the number of recipients really limited to 40000? Is it possible to change the limit per customer?bedit

Hi The configurable screens works nicely for archived but has one flaw. Example We used to have a document named "Purchase Order" but this was deleted and a new one was created called "Purchase Order Master" When I create an archive and what to see certain documents, then I can only see the active document template names and not the old ones allthough they still exist within the SuperOffice database, but in paranthesis like "(Purchase Order)" - this is the same for creating selections. (No way to search for stuff created by employees no longer with the company or for document templates deleted but still existing in database). The problem here is that the archive will not show the truth for the data. Know this has nothing to do with the main card, but I got back to this again now that I'm working on the Sales and Project cards. Best regards Ole

I tried to update from 9.2 to 10.1.5. We do not use AD authentication. When trying to update, I see the error below: I can reach the service and the previous updated was done without any issue. What can cause this problem? By the way, I saw, that 8.x installation retrieved the license info for next year and are valid until 2024. But no installation with 9.x or higher had retrieved the license for next year.

Hello friends!, I have question, or rather, something I don't understand. I've created a role that includes one thing from administration - the role 'Scriptadministrator'. When I try to use it, however, the only thing that is accessible in the admin panel is the superoffice webstore - and _not_ CRMScript. My question is, should I use a different role, or is this a bug?

Hi, We are testing with SuperOffice 10.1, for the use of the Exchange Synchronizer we also have an SuperOffice Windows client installed with the SOAdmin.exe, SOReporterStudio.exe and such. But non of them are starting, and they have an correct SuperOffice.ini and SuperOffice.config. I can log in our SuperOffice web enviroment with no problem, and access the settings and maintenance there with no issue. In SuperOffice 8.5 there was a need to have the Windows App licence to be able to run the admin client. The error i am getting: 221026 12:56:36 nvk        Login (ds:so_test_testdbserver uid:nvk pre:crm ) 221026 12:56:36 nvk        3.3015[SOAdmin.exe] Src: DbLoginDatabase at C:\Agent4\_work\1\s\Clients\SM.win\Source\DBDLL\Dapi.cpp v line 146  221026 12:56:36 nvk        3.1001[SOAdmin.exe] DbOpenDatabase failed Authentication failed!

We are setting up an webpanel with an external site. The site works fine in a separate window, in an iframe on some test page, but not in a SO Online-webpanel. The site is displayed and functioning without problems apart from the sessions.   The page is build with PHP and the sessions are standard PHP sessions. Did we do something stupid, or is this a knwon problem/limitation ?